Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback facelift vs Ford Taurus 5
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
FWD
AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring multi-link with stabilizer
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4871 mm / 191.8 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18
18 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-Temp
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2022
2007 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
36%
31%
21%
Pros
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
- Quite reliable
- Available with the famous Volvo T5
- Decent drivetrain
- Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
- Comfortable ride
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poor performance
- Uglier and less practical than the standard sedan
- Uninspiring exterior and interior
- Poor handling
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.