Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S80 facelift vs Volvo S40

Volvo S40 II facelift

Volvo S80 facelift

Volvo S40

Volvo S40 II faceliftVolvo S80 faceliftVolvo S40
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
2.9T
2.9T AT
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%17%17%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Sweet compact bi-turbo I6 in the T6
  • Interesting D5 inline-5 diesel
  • Great reliability record
  • Good safety record
  • Solid safety rating
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Sterile exterior and interior design
  • Uninspiring handling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.