Compare Volvo S40 II facelift vs Volvo S40 vs Volvo S80 II

Volvo S40 II facelift

Volvo S40

Volvo S80 II

Volvo S40 II faceliftVolvo S40Volvo S80 II
Variants
1.6 100hp
1.6 101hp
1.6 D2
1.6 DRIVe
2.0 D3
2.0 D3 AT
2.0 D4
2.0 D4 AT
2.0 Euro4
2.0 Euro5
2.0 FLEXIFUEL
2.5T 230hp
2.5T AT
2.5T AWD
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT
2.4D
2.4D AT
D5
D5 AT
2.5FT
2.5FT AT
2.5T
2.5T AT
3.2 AT
4.4 AT
4.4 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%17%55%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Quite reliable
  • Available with the famous Volvo T5
  • Solid safety rating
  • Sweet NA 4.4L V8
  • Turbo I6
  • Classy design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.