Compare Cadillac XTS facelift
Cadillac XTS facelift | |
---|---|
Variants | 3.6L V6 3.6L V6 AWD 3.6T V6 AWD |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 30% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"509 L / 18.0 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"7.1 L / 7.5 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"5.7 L / 6.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"70.0 L / 18.5 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"5"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs, 345 mm"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs, 315 mm"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"Independent, spring"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"245/45 R19"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"11.8 m / 38.7 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"4-door Sedan"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1510 mm / 59.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"5103 mm / 200.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1852 mm / 72.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1567.0 mm / 61.7 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1575.0 mm / 62.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1824.0 kg / 4021.2 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"19 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2837 mm / 111.7 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.30"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"12.3 L/100km / 19.1 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine","Fv":"LFX"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"94.0 mm / 3.7 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"11.5:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"309.0 hp / 230.4 kW @ 6800 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Redline","Fv":"7200 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"86.7 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"85.6 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"358 Nm / 264.0 lb-ft @ 5300 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"6-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2018 ~ 2019"}]]
Related Products
Lexus LS 5 (XF50) 2017
- Comfortable yet good-handling multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Imposing styling
· 68%
- Superb suspension setup all-around
- Amazing 4.2 TDI and W12 engines
- Class-leading interior appointment
· 75%
Audi A8 D3 (4E) 2002
- Glorious 4.2 TDI and W12 engine options
- Much improved ZF 6HP transmission
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
· 77%
- Great suspension setup
- Wonderful interior appointment
- Interesting W12, 4.2 TDI, and 4.0 TFSI engine options
· 81%
Audi A8 D4 (4H) 2010
- Great suspension setup with multi-link all-around
- Superb ZF 8HP automatic transmission
- Wonderful W12 and 4.2 TDI engine options
· 85%
- The wonderful M275 engine lives on
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Improved ABC and Airmatic reliability
· 85%
Ford Taurus 6 2009
- Increased power output
- Better interior appointments
- More imposing exterior design
· 21%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.