Compare Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC 1.25x IS PRO vs Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II vs Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R

Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC 1.25x IS PRO

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R

Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC 1.25x IS PRO  Olympus M.Zuiko ED 75-300mm F4.8-6.7 II  Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm F4-5.6 R

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%31%39%
Pros
  • Built-in 1.25x teleconverter
  • Optically stabilized
  • Superb autofocus
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • High maximum magnification
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with a tripod collar
  • Affordable for the useful reach
  • Rather light and compact for a super tele
  • Light in the hand
  • Very affordable
  • Useful reach
Cons
  • Large and heavy for MFT
  • Priced too high
  • Dark and variable maximum aperture
  • External zoom without zoom lock
  • Lens hood not included
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Dark and variable maximum aperture
  • External zoom without zoom lock
  • Lens hood not included
  • Lacks weather sealing

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.