Compare Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC 1.25x IS PRO vs Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR vs Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC 1.25x IS PRO

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR

Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

Olympus M.Zuiko 150-400mm F4.5 TC 1.25x IS PRO  Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR  Fujifilm XF 80mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR Macro

Reviews

Neofiliac score48%62%88%
Pros
  • Built-in 1.25x teleconverter
  • Optically stabilized
  • Superb autofocus
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • High maximum magnification
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with a tripod collar
  • Superb image quality
  • Optically stabilized
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with physical aperture ring
  • Comes with a tripod collar
  • Optically stabilized
  • High maximum magnification
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with physical aperture ring
  • Superb image quality
Cons
  • Large and heavy for MFT
  • Priced too high
  • Long barrel
  • On the heavy side
  • External zoom without zoom lock
  • Sized / weighs like a full-frame equivalent

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.