Compare Fujifilm XF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR vs Tamron 17–70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD (B070) vs Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR

Fujifilm XF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR

Tamron 17–70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD (B070)

Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR

Fujifilm XF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR  Tamron 17–70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD (B070)  Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR

Reviews

Neofiliac score43%59%62%
Pros
  • Optically stabilized
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with physical aperture ring
  • Comes with a tripod collar
  • Great image quality
  • Optically stabilized
  • Weather-sealed
  • Decent build quality
  • Optically stabilized
  • Weather-sealed
  • Comes with physical aperture ring
Cons
  • Very dark maximum aperture
  • Large and heavy like a full-frame lens
  • Not the highest grade of image quality
  • Dark maximum aperture
  • External zoom without zoom lock

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.