Compare Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro vs Canon RF-S 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM vs Canon RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM

Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro

Canon RF-S 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM

Canon RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM

Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro  Canon RF-S 18-45mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM  Canon RF 24-105mm F4 L IS USM

Reviews

Neofiliac score60%19%71%
Pros
  • Optically stabilized
  • Zoom lock prevents zoom creep
  • Weather-sealed
  • Optically stabilized
  • Short barrel
  • Light in the hand
  • Good image quality all-around
  • Optically stabilized
  • Weather-sealed
Cons
  • All-in-one lenses tend to offer lower IQ
  • Not the highest grade of build
  • Dark maximum aperture
  • External zoom without zoom lock
  • Lens hood not included
  • Lacks weather sealing
  • Dark maximum aperture

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.