Compare Philips 498P9Z DQHD Curved vs MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLED vs Samsung C49RG90 DQHD QLED Curved

Philips 498P9Z DQHD Curved

MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLED

Samsung C49RG90 DQHD QLED Curved

Philips 498P9Z DQHD Curved MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLEDSamsung C49RG90 DQHD QLED Curved

Reviews

Neofiliac score84%90%93%
Pros
  • DisplayHDR 400
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800R curvature
  • Rich color reproduction
  • Stand with tilt, swivel, and height adjustments
  • High 3000:1 contrast ratio
  • High 90.82 % screen-to-body ratio
  • Build-in speakers included
  • 165 Hz maximum refresh rate
  • One of the first QD-OLED gaming monitors
  • HDR10, DisplayHDR 400 True Black
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800R curvature
  • Fast 0.1 ms response time
  • 10-bit display panel
  • HDR10, DisplayHDR 1000
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800 curvature
  • Rich color reproduction
  • Stand with tilt, swivel, and height adjustments
  • High 3000:1 contrast ratio
  • 10-bit display panel
  • Bright display panel
  • High 91.12 % screen-to-body ratio
Cons
  • 8-bit display panel
  • Stand lacks ergonomic adjustment
  • Display panel not very bright

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.