Compare Nissan Z RZ34 vs Subaru BRZ vs Mazda RX-8
Variants
AT
MT
MT
AT
Renesis 2003
40th Anniversary
Revolution High-Power
Challenge High-Power
Type S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
290 L / 10.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
8.7 L / 9.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1316 mm / 51.8 in
Size | Length
4379 mm / 172.4 in
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.30
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV2-LEV. Tier2-Bin5
Euro 6
Engine
VR30DDTT
FA20D
13B
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
12.5:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
1.3 L / 79.8 cu-in / 1308.0 cc
Engine | Power
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 6400 rpm
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
133.5 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
475 Nm / 350.3 lb-ft @ 1600-5600 rpm
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol rotary2 engine
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2021
2012 ~ 2020
Debut
2021-08
Made In
Japan
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
74%
84%
Pros
- Rather good performance
- Affordable pricing
- Usable trunk
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low center of gravity
- Good balance
- Compact engine and lightweight chassis
- Glorious 9000rpm redline
- Great weight distribution
- Double-wishbone + multilink suspension setup
- Great handling characteristics
Cons
- Unsophisticated chassis
- Average handling
- Down on engine power
- MacPherson front suspension
- Low cargo capacity
- Not a thoroughbred
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.