Compare Nissan Z RZ34 vs Nissan Altima 4 Coupe vs Honda Civic 7 Coupe
Variants
AT
MT
2.5
3.5
1.7 120
1.7 125
1.7 125 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
454 L / 16.0 cu-ft
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
2
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/55 R17
195/60 R15
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1316 mm / 51.8 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
1399 mm / 55.1 in
Size | Length
4379 mm / 172.4 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4438 mm / 174.7 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2620 mm / 103.1 in
Performance
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV2-LEV. Tier2-Bin5
Engine
VR30DDTT
D17A
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
1.7 L / 101.8 cu-in / 1668.0 cc
Engine | Power
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
133.5 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
94.4 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
475 Nm / 350.3 lb-ft @ 1600-5600 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2021
2007 ~ 2012
2001 ~ 2006
Debut
2021-08
Made In
Japan
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
37%
21%
Pros
- Rather good performance
- Affordable pricing
- Usable trunk
- Reliable engines
- Decent exterior and interior finish
- Reliable
- Decent drivetrain
Cons
- Unsophisticated chassis
- Average handling
- CVT
- Impractical
- Slow and sluggish
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.