Compare Nissan Z RZ34 vs Nissan 200SX S15 vs Nissan 370Z
Variants
AT
MT
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1316 mm / 51.8 in
1285 mm / 50.6 in
Size | Length
4379 mm / 172.4 in
4445 mm / 175.0 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV2-LEV. Tier2-Bin5
Euro 5
Engine
VR30DDTT
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
7500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
133.5 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
475 Nm / 350.3 lb-ft @ 1600-5600 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2021
1999 ~ 2002
Debut
2021-08
Made In
Japan
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
72%
81%
Pros
- Rather good performance
- Affordable pricing
- Usable trunk
- Good overall styling
- Small turning circle
- Reliable drivetrain
- Good handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Some reliability concerns
Cons
- Unsophisticated chassis
- Average handling
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Less handsome than the S14
- Low cargo capacity
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.