Compare Nissan Z RZ34 vs Hyundai Genesis Coupe facelift vs Hyundai Coupe 2
Variants
AT
MT
2.0 TCi
2.0 TCi AT
3.8
3.8 AT
3.8 GDi
3.8 GDi AT
1.6
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
332 L / 11.7 cu-ft
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
3-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
122 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1316 mm / 51.8 in
1385 mm / 54.5 in
1330 mm / 52.4 in
Size | Length
4379 mm / 172.4 in
4630 mm / 182.3 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1865 mm / 73.4 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16 H2
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
40.3 m / 132.2 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
LEV2-LEV. Tier2-Bin5
Euro 4
Engine
VR30DDTT
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
Engine | Power
400.0 hp / 298.3 kW @ 6400 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
133.5 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
475 Nm / 350.3 lb-ft @ 1600-5600 rpm
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Production
Availability
2021
2013 ~ 2016
Debut
2021-08
Made In
Japan
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
46%
22%
Pros
- Rather good performance
- Affordable pricing
- Usable trunk
- New engine options
- More power than pre-facelift
- Decent suspension setup
Cons
- Unsophisticated chassis
- Average handling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Long-term reliability concerns
- Bland styling
- No powerful engine options
- Not very well built
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.