Compare Nissan Qashqai 3 vs Nissan Murano 3 vs Nissan Rogue 2

Variants
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
15.8 deg
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
24.4 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
4897 mm / 192.8 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1915 mm / 75.4 in
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2824 mm / 111.2 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT

Production

Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-18
Made In
UK

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
24%
37%
Pros
  • Cheap to buy
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Improved styling
  • Improved interior appointments
Cons
  • Very ugly
  • Horrible build quality
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Waste of raw materials
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Poor CVT
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad engine reputation
  • Unreliable CVTs
  • Poor handling
  • MacPherson front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.