HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volkswagen ID.3 vs Volkswagen Polo 5 facelift vs Volkswagen Cross Polo 5

Variants
Pro
Pro Performance
Pro S
Pure Performance
1.0 60
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DCT
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 DCT
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DCT
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DCT
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
GTI
GTI DCT
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DCT
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DCT
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DCT
1.4 85
1.4 85 DCT
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 DCT
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1267 L / 44.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
215/40 R17
Turning Circle
10.2 m / 33.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
408.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Hatchback
Platform
MEB

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
150 mm / 5.9 in
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1568 mm / 61.7 in
1488 mm / 58.6 in
Size | Length
4261 mm / 167.8 in
3987 mm / 157.0 in
Track Width | Front
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
1454.0 mm / 57.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
1453.0 mm / 57.2 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2770 mm / 109.1 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020-06-17 (2020-10 delivery date)
Debut
2019 IAA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
25%
6%
Pros
  • Up to extraordinary 549km electric range
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Rather smart, sporty design
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.