Compare Toyota Yaris Cross vs Subaru Crosstrek 2 vs Subaru Crosstrek
Variants
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.5 CVT
1.6 CVT
1.6 MT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.0DL
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
589 L / 20.8 cu-ft ~ 1566 L / 55.3 cu-ft
1270 L / 44.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 294.64 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 274.32 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.6 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/50 R18
225/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Platform
TNGA: GA-B
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
221 mm / 8.7 in
Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
1615 mm / 63.6 in
Size | Length
4180 mm / 164.6 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
4450 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2560 mm / 100.8 in
2664 mm / 104.9 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2020
2020
2012 ~ 2017
Debut
2020-04-23
Made In
Japan, France
Japan, Malaysia, Thailand
Reviews
Neofiliac score
9%
36%
33%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Characterful engines
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Basic equipment
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor handling
- Bland
- No powerful engine options
- Horrible CVT
- Bad styling
- Basic interior
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.