Compare Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W167 vs Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)

Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W167

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)

Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W167Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota Harrier 4 / Venza 2 (XU80)
Variants
AMG GLE 53
AMG GLE 63
AMG GLE 63 S
GLE 300d
GLE 350d
GLE 350de
GLE 400d
GLE 450
GLE 580
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score79%42%29%
Pros
  • Great performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.