Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Nissan Rogue 2 vs Nissan Rogue
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
AWD
AWD 2011+
FWD
FWD 2011+
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/70 R16, 225/60 R17, 225/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
211 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 18
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.3 sec
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Engine
QR25DE
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
237 Nm / 174.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Debut
2018-07-25
Made In
Hungary, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
37%
25%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good marketing
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
- Better appointed than the Qashqai
Cons
- Impractical and ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.