Compare Jeep Cherokee KL vs Mazda CX-5 II vs Mazda CX-9

Variants
2.0 272 AT
2.0 272 AWD AT
2.0 Multijet II 140
2.0 Multijet II 140 AWD
2.0 Multijet II 170 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 185 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AT
2.2 MultiJet II 195 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.2 MultiJet II 200 AWD AT
2.4 177 AT
2.4 177 AWD AT
2.4 180 AT
2.4 180 AWD AT
3.2 271 AT
3.2 272 AWD AT
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AT
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AWD
2.0 SKYACTIV-G AWD AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AWD
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 150 AWD AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AT
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AWD
2.2 SKYACTIV-D 184 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 187 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 194 AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G 194 AWD AT
2.5 SKYACTIV-G AWD AT
3.5 AWD
3.7
3.7 2010+
3.7 2013+
3.7 AWD 2013+
3.7 AWD 2010+

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
487 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 2852 L / 100.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
7
Payload
671 kg / 1479 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Length
4575 mm / 180.1 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1654.0 mm / 65.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2875 mm / 113.2 in

Performance

Top Speed
192.0 km/h / 119.3 mph

Powertrain

Engine
Ford Durtec 35
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
24%
40%
65%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good engine lineup
  • Decent build quality
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Disgrace to the Cherokee name
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.