Compare MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLED vs Samsung S49A950U DQHD Curved vs Samsung M5 32M50A

MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLED

Samsung S49A950U DQHD Curved

Samsung M5 32M50A

MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLEDSamsung S49A950U DQHD Curved Samsung M5 32M50A

Reviews

Neofiliac score90%91%26%
Pros
  • One of the first QD-OLED gaming monitors
  • HDR10, DisplayHDR 400 True Black
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800R curvature
  • Fast 0.1 ms response time
  • 10-bit display panel
  • HDR10+, HDR, DisplayHDR 400
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800R curvature
  • Rich color reproduction
  • Stand with tilt, swivel, and height adjustments
  • High 3000:1 contrast ratio
  • 10-bit display panel
  • High 90.76 % screen-to-body ratio
  • Build-in speakers included
  • High 3000:1 contrast ratio
  • High 90.26 % screen-to-body ratio
  • Build-in speakers included
Cons
  • Stand lacks ergonomic adjustment
  • Display panel not very bright
  • Low 69 ppi pixel density
  • Only tilt adjustment
  • 8-bit display panel
  • Display panel not very bright

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.