Compare MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLED vs Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 UW-QHD Curved OLED vs AOC AGON AG353UCG UW-QHD Curved

MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLED

Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 UW-QHD Curved OLED

AOC AGON AG353UCG UW-QHD Curved

MSI MEG 342C UW-QHD Curved QD-OLEDCorsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 UW-QHD Curved OLEDAOC AGON AG353UCG UW-QHD Curved

Reviews

Neofiliac score90%94%77%
Pros
  • One of the first QD-OLED gaming monitors
  • HDR10, DisplayHDR 400 True Black
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800R curvature
  • Fast 0.1 ms response time
  • 10-bit display panel
  • Bendable from flat to 800R-curved
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • Gorgeous OLED panel
  • Fast 0.03 ms response time
  • High 1350000:1 contrast ratio
  • 10-bit display panel
  • Support for NVIDIA G-SYNC
  • DisplayHDR 1000
  • Ultra-wide form factor
  • 1800R curvature
  • Stand with tilt, swivel, and height adjustments
  • High 2500:1 contrast ratio
  • Bright display panel
  • Support for NVIDIA G-SYNC
  • Build-in speakers included
  • 200 Hz refresh rate
Cons
  • Stand lacks ergonomic adjustment
  • Display panel not very bright
  • Stand lacks ergonomic adjustment
  • 8-bit display panel

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.