Compare Mazda MX-30 (DR) vs Mazda CX-9 II (TC) vs Mazda CX-5 (KE)

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

Mazda CX-5 (KE)

Mazda MX-30 (DR)Mazda CX-9 II (TC)Mazda CX-5 (KE)
Variants
AWD
FWD
2.0 160 AWD
2.0 160 AWD AT
2.0 165
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD
2.0 160 Euro6 AWD AT
2.0 165 Euro6
2.2D 150
2.2D 150 AWD
2.2D 150 AWD AT
2.2D 150 AT
2.2D 175 AWD
2.2D 175 AWD AT
2.5 192 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score4%37%45%
Pros
  • Pay less tax
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good exterior styling
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.