Compare Renault Grand Scenic 4 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 4
Variants
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 115
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 160 AT
1.3 TCe 160
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 110 Hybrid
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 160 AT
1.7 dCi 120
1.7 dCi 120 AT
1.7 dCi 150
1.7 dCi 150 AT
Pacifica Hybrid
Pacifica
2.4
2.4 AT
2.5D
2.8D AT
3.3
3.3 AWD
3.8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
915 L / 32.3 cu-ft ~ 3979 L / 140.5 cu-ft
920 L / 32.5 cu-ft ~ 4130 L / 145.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 320 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 290 mm
Disc
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Solid axle, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 245/50 R20
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1777 mm / 70.0 in
Size | Length
5176 mm / 203.8 in
Size | Width
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2128 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded)
2022 mm / 79.6 in | 2297 mm / 90.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1997 mm / 78.6 in
Track Width | Front
1602.0 mm / 63.1 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1596.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
20 in
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
16 in
Wheelbase
2804 mm / 110.4 in
3089 mm / 121.6 in
3030 mm / 119.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Towing Capacity
1633 kg / 3600 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 220.0 cu-in / 3605.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
355 Nm / 261.8 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Production
Availability
2016
2001 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
10%
56%
26%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good styling
- Very high cargo capacity
- Large interior space
- Very comfortable
- Very high cargo capacity
- Lots of interior space
Cons
- Very ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.