Compare Citroen C4 Grand SpaceTourer vs Skoda Roomster vs Citroen C8
Variants
1.2 PureTech 131
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 131
1.5 BlueHDi 131 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 163 AT
1.2 64
1.2 70
1.2 TDI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 AT
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 86 Euro5
1.4 86
1.4 TDI 70
1.4 TDI 80
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.9 TDI 103
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1780 L / 62.9 cu-ft
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
7
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1638 mm / 64.5 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
Size | Length
4602 mm / 181.2 in
4727 mm / 186.1 in
Size | Width
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
1684 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Front
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2823 mm / 111.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
17%
20%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent interior space
- Lots of usable space inside for such a small car
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Some unreliable petrol engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor automatic transmissions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.