Compare Citroen C4 Grand SpaceTourer vs Citroen C3 Picasso vs Citroen C8
Variants
1.2 PureTech 131
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 131
1.5 BlueHDi 131 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 163 AT
1.4 VTi
1.4 VTi Euro5
1.4 VTi LPG
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi 109PS
1.6 HDi 112PS
1.6 HDi 90PS
1.6 VTi 115PS
1.6 VTi 120PS
2.0 HDi 163
2.0 HDi 163 AT
2.0 HDi 109
2.0 HDi 109 AT
2.0 HDi 120
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 140
2.0 140 AT
2.2 HDi 128
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170
2.2 HDi Biturbo 170 AT
2.2 158
3.0 204 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
225 L / 7.9 cu-ft ~ 2948 L / 104.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
7
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Minivan
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Minivan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1638 mm / 64.5 in
1669 mm / 65.7 in
Size | Length
4602 mm / 181.2 in
4078 mm / 160.6 in
4727 mm / 186.1 in
Size | Width
1826 mm / 71.9 in | 2117 mm / 83.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1971 mm / 77.6 in (mirror folded)
1766 mm / 69.5 in | 2050 mm / 80.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1573.0 mm / 61.9 in
1466.0 mm / 57.7 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1465.0 mm / 57.7 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2823 mm / 111.1 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.308
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Stroke
90.5 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
2%
20%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent interior space
- Easy to fix
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- Some unreliable petrol engines
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No independent rear suspensions
- Poor automatic transmissions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.