HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Clio 4 Wagon facelift vs Skoda Fabia 2 Combi vs Renault Clio 4 Estate

Variants
0.9 TCe 90
0.9 TCe 75
1.2 75
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 90
1.2 MPI 60PS
1.2 MPI 70PS
1.4 MPI
1.4 TDI 70PS
1.4 TDI 80PS
1.4 TDI DPF
1.6 MPI
1.6 MPI AT
1.9 TDI
0.9 Energy TCe
1.2
1.2 TCe AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi AT
1.5 Energy dCi

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.0 m / 32.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1475 mm / 58.1 in
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4267 mm / 168.0 in
4239 mm / 166.9 in
4267 mm / 168.0 in
Size | Width
1732 mm / 68.2 in | 1945 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1642 mm / 64.6 in
1732 mm / 68.2 in
Track Width | Front
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
5J x 14, 6J x 14, 6J x 15
Wheelbase
2589 mm / 101.9 in
2462 mm / 96.9 in
2589 mm / 101.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Stroke
73.1 mm / 2.9 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2010
2013 ~ 2016

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
6%
4%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible performance
  • Ugly
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No fully independent suspensions
  • Ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Not even fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.