HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Nissan Micra 5 vs Nissan Note vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift

Variants
0.9 Turbo
1.0 73
1.0 Turbo 117
1.0 71
1.0 Turbo 100
1.5 dCi
1.4 88
1.4 88 2010+
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 1004 L / 35.5 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
41.0 L / 10.8 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Rigid axle
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.3 m / 33.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
3999 mm / 157.4 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1743 mm / 68.6 in | 1935 mm / 76.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
4%
23%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Engine reliability and repair-ability are fine
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Horrible performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor handling
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Rigid rear axle
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.