Compare DS 3 Crossback vs Mazda MX-30 (DR) vs Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

DS 3 Crossback

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mazda CX-9 II (TC)

DS 3 CrossbackMazda MX-30 (DR)Mazda CX-9 II (TC)
Variants
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
AWD
FWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score8%4%37%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Pay less tax
  • Good styling
  • Rather good engine
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor handling
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.