Compare Cadillac ATS
Cadillac ATS | |
---|---|
Variants | 2.0 2.0 AWD 2.0 MT 2.5 3.6 325 3.6 325 AWD 3.6 340 3.6 340 AWD ATS-V ATS-V MT |
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 78% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"381 L / 13.5 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Coolant Capacity","Fv":"7.7 L / 8.1 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Engine Oil Capacity","Fv":"4.7 L / 5.0 qt"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"62.5 L / 16.5 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"5"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"MacPherson strut"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"225/45 R17, 225/40 ZR18, 255/35 R18"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Turning Circle","Fv":"11.1 m / 36.4 ft"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"4-door Sedan"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1427 mm / 56.2 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4644 mm / 182.8 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1805 mm / 71.1 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1512.0 mm / 59.5 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1548.0 mm / 60.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1465.0 kg / 3229.8 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"8J x 17, 8J x 18"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2775 mm / 109.3 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"5.9 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"5.6 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"191 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Coefficient Of Drag","Fv":"0.30"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"8.2 L/100km / 28.7 MPG (combined) | 11.6 L/100km / 20.3 MPG (urban) | 6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"220.0 km/h / 136.7 mph"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Towing Capacity","Fv":"750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1136 kg / 2504 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine","Fv":"LTG"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"86.0 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"9.5:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"276.0 hp / 205.8 kW @ 5500 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Redline","Fv":"7000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"138.1 hp/L / 2.3 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"86.0 mm / 3.4 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"353 Nm / 260.4 lb-ft @ 1700-5500 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"6-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2013 ~ 2019"}]]
Related Products
BMW 3 Series F30 2011
- Great ZF 8HP automatic transmission
- Down to 4.8s 0-100kph time
- Up to 630Nm of torque
· 71%
BMW 3 Series E46 LCI 2001
- Good M54 and M57 engine options
- Good towing capacity
- Classic BMW handling characteristics
· 65%
BMW 3 Series E46 1998
- Interesting M54 and M57 engine options
- Easy to DIY
- Simple and classy exterior design
· 52%
BMW 3 Series E90 LCI 2008
- Powertrain became more powerful
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
· 76%
- Last chance to get M156 in C63 AMG
- Somewhat improved styling
- Reasonably reliable engine lineup
· 84%
BMW 3 Series F30 LCI 2015
- More reliable B58 and B48 engines
- Down to 4.8s 0-100kph time
- Up to 630Nm of torque
· 73%
BMW 3 Series E90 2005
- Sweet N52 and M57 inline-6 engines
- Still easy to DIY
- Good aftermarket support
· 59%
Audi A3 (8V) 2013
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.5L/100km fuel consumption
- Good manual transmission
· 47%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.