Compare Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) vs Alfa Romeo 166 facelift vs Citroen C6
Variants
2.0T 200 AT
2.0T 200 Euro6d AT
2.0T 280 AT
2.0T 280 AWD AT
2.2 JTDm 136
2.2 JTDm 150
2.2 JTDm 150 AT
2.2 JTDm 180
2.2 JTDm 180 AT
2.2 JTDm 136 Euro6d
2.2 JTDm 136 Euro6d AT
2.2 JTDm 160 Euro6d AT
2.2 JTDm 190 Euro6d AT
2.2 JTDm 190 Euro6d AWD AT
2.2 JTDm 210 Euro6d AWD AT
Quadrifoglio
Quadrifoglio AT
Quadrifoglio Euro6d AT
Veloce 2.0T 280 AWD AT
Veloce 2.2 JTDm 210 AWD AT
2.0 TS
2.4 JTD 10V
2.4 JTD 20V
2.4 JTD 20V AT
2.5 V6
3.0 V6 AT
3.2 V6
2.2 HDi MT
2.2 HDi
2.7 HDi
3.0 HDi
3.0
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
480 L / 17.0 cu-ft
490 L / 17.3 cu-ft
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
12.4 m / 40.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
PSA PF3
Dimensions
Size | Height
1416 mm / 55.7 in
1464 mm / 57.6 in
Size | Length
4720 mm / 185.8 in
4908 mm / 193.2 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2820 mm / 111.0 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2900 mm / 114.2 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
745 kg / 1642 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
77%
43%
52%
Pros
- Gorgeous styling
- Good power delivery in the Quadrifoglio
- Manual transmission
- Great suspension setup
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Improved exterior design
- Improved engine lineup
- Gorgeous styling (albeit unique)
- Hydractive 3 hydraulic suspension
Cons
- Reliability concerns
- Less well appointed than many competitors
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable engines
- Interior fit and finish not the best
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.