Compare Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A3 Cabriolet 8V facelift vs Nissan Micra C+C
Variants
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI ultra
1.4 TFSI ultra DCT
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI DCT
2.0 TDI 185 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
1.4
1.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1441 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
3808 mm / 149.9 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1668 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
Wheelbase
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
74%
24%
10%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
- Decent reliability
- Not much
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Looks like a cheaper car
- Built like a cheaper car
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.