Compare Lamborghini Gallardo 2 Spyder vs Lamborghini Murcielago Roadster vs Pagani Zonda Roadster
Variants
LP 550-2 AT
LP 560-4 Spyder
LP 560-4 Spyder AT
Performante Spyder
Performante Spyder AT
Murcielago LP 640 Roadster
Murcielago Roadster
Zonda Roadster
Zonda Cinque Roadster
Zonda Roadster F
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
110 L / 3.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
21.0 L / 22.2 qt
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
175 kg / 386 lbs
310 kg / 683 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
12.6 m / 41.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1184 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Width
1900 mm / 74.8 in
2055 mm / 80.9 in
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1695.0 mm / 66.7 in
Weight
1690.0 kg / 3725.8 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19, 11J x 19
Front wheel rims: 8.5 J x 18 Rear wheel rims: 13 J x 18
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2560 mm / 100.8 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
495 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Top Speed
330.0 km/h / 205.1 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
CEH
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
7.3 L / 444.9 cu-in / 7291.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V10 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
86%
98%
Pros
- Great speed and acceleration
- Good, characterful V10
- RWD available
- Superb performance
- Great V12 sound
- Exceptionally sensuous styling
- Jewel-like instrument and controls
- Superb V12 engine
- Exceptional chassis and suspension
- Very light
Cons
- Ostentatious
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- Quite uncomfortable
- Reliability issues
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- Too exclusive
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.