Compare Lamborghini Gallardo 2 Spyder vs Chrysler Crossfire Roadster vs Chrysler 200 Convertible

Variants
LP 550-2 AT
LP 560-4 Spyder
LP 560-4 Spyder AT
Performante Spyder
Performante Spyder AT
Crossfire Roadster
Crossfire Roadster AT
Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 AT
2.4
3.6

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
110 L / 3.9 cu-ft
105 L / 3.7 cu-ft ~ 190 L / 6.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
21.0 L / 22.2 qt
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
175 kg / 386 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1184 mm / 46.6 in
1305 mm / 51.4 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
4947 mm / 194.8 in
Size | Width
1900 mm / 74.8 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19, 11J x 19
Wheelbase
2560 mm / 100.8 in
2400 mm / 94.5 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine
CEH
M112 E32
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
3.2 L / 195.2 cu-in / 3199.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V10 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2011 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
83%
82%
45%
Pros
  • Great speed and acceleration
  • Good, characterful V10
  • RWD available
  • Good styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Good M112 / M112K engines
  • Good handling
  • Better styled than the Sebring
  • Decent drivetrain
  • Good comfort
Cons
  • Ostentatious
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Very little cargo space
  • Very little cargo space
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad handling
  • Quite front-heavy

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.