Compare Lamborghini Murcielago Roadster vs Nissan 350Z Roadster vs Nissan 370Z Roadster

Variants
Murcielago LP 640 Roadster
Murcielago Roadster
283
300 AT
300
313
313 AT
MT
AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
310 kg / 683 lbs
195 kg / 430 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.6 m / 41.2 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1325 mm / 52.2 in
Size | Length
4250 mm / 167.3 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1845 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1695.0 mm / 66.7 in
Weight
1690.0 kg / 3725.8 lbs
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 8.5 J x 18 Rear wheel rims: 13 J x 18
Wheelbase
2665 mm / 104.9 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
495 g/km
Fuel Economy
11.4 L/100km / 20.6 MPG (combined) | 17.0 L/100km / 13.8 MPG (urban) | 9.2 L/100km / 25.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
330.0 km/h / 205.1 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Engine
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
3.7 L / 225.5 cu-in / 3696.0 cc
Engine | Power
328.0 hp / 244.6 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
88.7 hp/L / 1.5 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
363 Nm / 267.7 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
86%
79%
82%
Pros
  • Superb performance
  • Great V12 sound
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Sweet and reliable engine
  • Good manual transmission
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all around
  • Improved drivetrain
  • Improved styling
  • Great handling
  • Great suspension setup
Cons
  • Quite uncomfortable
  • Reliability issues
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Very little cargo space
  • Poor interior quality
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Very little cargo space
  • Poor interior quality
  • Very tight inside

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.