Compare Aston Martin Vantage Roadster vs Audi TT RS 8J Roadster vs Audi A4 B6 Cabriolet
Variants
V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3
V8 Vantage Roadster 4.7
V8 Vantage Roadster 4.7 AT
V8 Vantage N430 Roadster
V8 Vantage N430 Roadster AT
V8 Vantage S Roadster
V8 Vantage S Roadster AT
V12 Vantage S Roadster AT
2.5 TFSI (340 Hp)
TT RS DCT
TT RS MT
TT RS plus DCT
TT RS plus MT
1.8T 163
1.8T 163 CVT
1.8T 163 quattro
1.8T 170 CVT
2.0
2.4
2.4 CVT
2.5 TDI
2.5 TDI CVT
3.0
3.0 CVT
3.0 quattro
3.0 quattro AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
250 L / 8.8 cu-ft
246 L / 8.7 cu-ft ~ 315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.8 L / 15.6 qt
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
480 kg / 1058 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/40 R18
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1348 mm / 53.1 in
1391 mm / 54.8 in
Size | Length
4198 mm / 165.3 in
4573 mm / 180.0 in
Size | Width
1842 mm / 72.5 in | 1952 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1523.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1523.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
9J x 18
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
2654 mm / 104.5 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
AJ37
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.3 cu-in / 2480.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-5 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Reviews
Neofiliac score
98%
74%
55%
Pros
- Exceptionally sensuous styling
- Superb handling
- Best-in-class suspension setup
- Wonderful engines
- Manual transmissions
- Decent performance
- Interesting 2.5 TFSI engine
- Decent reliability
- Decent engine reliability
- Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
- Some reliability concerns
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Horrible CVT
- Horrendous ZF 5HP automatic transmission
- Awkward proportions
- Mediocre build quality
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.