Compare Aston Martin Vantage Roadster vs Nissan 370Z Roadster vs Nissan Micra C+C
Variants
V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3
V8 Vantage Roadster 4.7
V8 Vantage Roadster 4.7 AT
V8 Vantage N430 Roadster
V8 Vantage N430 Roadster AT
V8 Vantage S Roadster
V8 Vantage S Roadster AT
V12 Vantage S Roadster AT
MT
AT
1.4
1.6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
14.8 L / 15.6 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1325 mm / 52.2 in
1441 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4250 mm / 167.3 in
3808 mm / 149.9 in
Size | Width
1845 mm / 72.6 in
1668 mm / 65.7 in
Track Width | Front
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
Performance
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
AJ37
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.7 L / 225.5 cu-in / 3696.0 cc
Engine | Power
328.0 hp / 244.6 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
88.7 hp/L / 1.5 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
363 Nm / 267.7 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2019
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
98%
82%
10%
Pros
- Exceptionally sensuous styling
- Superb handling
- Best-in-class suspension setup
- Wonderful engines
- Manual transmissions
- Improved drivetrain
- Improved styling
- Great handling
- Great suspension setup
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
Cons
- Some reliability concerns
- Very little cargo space
- Poor interior quality
- Very tight inside
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.