Compare Chevrolet Camaro 5 vs Chevrolet Camaro 6 vs Volvo C70 II

Chevrolet Camaro 5

Chevrolet Camaro 6

Volvo C70 II

Chevrolet Camaro 5Chevrolet Camaro 6Volvo C70 II
Variants
L99 AT
LS3
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
3.6
3.6 AT
6.2
6.2 AT
ZL1
ZL1 AT
2.0D
2.0D AT
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.4D
D5
D5 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 230 AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230

Reviews

Neofiliac score76%80%29%
Pros
  • Athletic design
  • Wide range of powerful yet efficient engine choices
  • Improved drivetrain reliability
  • Decent performance
  • Affordable way to get a big V8
  • Sounds great
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Cheap on the used market
Cons
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low side and rear visibility
  • Build quality concerns
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Quite ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Diesel in a convertible
  • Complicated top mechanism

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.