Compare Chrysler Crossfire Roadster vs Renault Megane 3 CC vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
Crossfire Roadster
Crossfire Roadster AT
Crossfire Roadster SRT-6 AT
1.2 TCe 130
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 TCe 180
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
105 L / 3.7 cu-ft ~ 190 L / 6.7 cu-ft
211 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 417 L / 14.7 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1305 mm / 51.4 in
1434 mm / 56.5 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
4485 mm / 176.6 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in | 2072 mm / 81.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2400 mm / 94.5 in
2609 mm / 102.7 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.310
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
M112 E32
Engine | Bore
89.9 mm / 3.5 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
3.2 L / 195.2 cu-in / 3199.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
22%
23%
Pros
- Good styling
- Small turning circle
- Good M112 / M112K engines
- Good handling
- Improved engine lineup
- Decent reliability
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Slow and sluggish
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Diesel in convertible
- No independent rear suspensions
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.