HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Chrysler 200 Convertible vs Chrysler Sebring 3 Convertible vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible

Variants
2.4
3.6
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
Hard Top 2.0 CRD
Soft Top 2.0 CRD
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
325 kg / 717 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/60 R17, 215/55 R18
195/65 R15

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4947 mm / 194.8 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1775.0 kg / 3913.2 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6, 5J x 17, 7, 0J x 18
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2011 ~ 2014
2007 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
45%
43%
23%
Pros
  • Better styled than the Sebring
  • Decent drivetrain
  • Good comfort
  • Available as both hard- and soft-top
  • Decent petrol engines
  • OK-looking with the top down
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad handling
  • Quite front-heavy
  • Quite slow
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat awkward styling
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly with the top up
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor chassis and suspension

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.