Compare Chrysler 200 Convertible vs Renault Megane 3 CC vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
2.4
3.6
1.2 TCe 130
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 TCe 180
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
211 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 417 L / 14.7 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1434 mm / 56.5 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4947 mm / 194.8 in
4485 mm / 176.6 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in | 2072 mm / 81.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1594.0 mm / 62.8 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2609 mm / 102.7 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
0.310
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2011 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
22%
23%
Pros
- Better styled than the Sebring
- Decent drivetrain
- Good comfort
- Improved engine lineup
- Decent reliability
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad handling
- Quite front-heavy
- Slow and sluggish
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Diesel in convertible
- No independent rear suspensions
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.