Compare Nissan 350Z Roadster vs Nissan Micra C+C vs Renault Megane 3 CC
Variants
283
300 AT
300
313
313 AT
1.4
1.6
1.2 TCe 130
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 TCe 180
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
255 L / 9.0 cu-ft ~ 457 L / 16.1 cu-ft
211 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 417 L / 14.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
5.3 L / 5.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
195 kg / 430 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1441 mm / 56.7 in
1434 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
3808 mm / 149.9 in
4485 mm / 176.6 in
Size | Width
1815 mm / 71.5 in
1668 mm / 65.7 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in | 2072 mm / 81.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1448.0 mm / 57.0 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2432 mm / 95.7 in
2609 mm / 102.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.310
Fuel Economy
11.4 L/100km / 20.6 MPG (combined) | 17.0 L/100km / 13.8 MPG (urban) | 9.2 L/100km / 25.6 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2005 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
79%
10%
22%
Pros
- Good handling characteristics
- Sweet and reliable engine
- Good manual transmission
- Double-wishbone suspensions all around
- Decent reliability
- No diesel nonsense
- Optional glass roof
- Improved engine lineup
- Decent reliability
Cons
- Poor interior quality
- Low cargo capacity
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Slow and sluggish
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Diesel in convertible
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.