Compare Renault Megane 3 CC vs Chrysler Sebring 3 Convertible vs Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible
Variants
1.2 TCe 130
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
GT 2.0 dCi 160
GT 2.0 TCe 180
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
3.5
3.5 AT
Hard Top 2.0 CRD
Soft Top 2.0 CRD
2.0
2.0 AT
2.4
2.4 Turbo
2.4 Turbo AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
211 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 417 L / 14.7 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
4
Payload
325 kg / 717 lbs
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/60 R17, 215/55 R18
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.9 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1434 mm / 56.5 in
1600 mm / 63.0 in
Size | Length
4485 mm / 176.6 in
4290 mm / 168.9 in
Size | Width
1811 mm / 71.3 in | 2072 mm / 81.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in
1705 mm / 67.1 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
Weight
1775.0 kg / 3913.2 lbs
1500.0 kg / 3306.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6, 5J x 17, 7, 0J x 18
6J x 15
Wheelbase
2609 mm / 102.7 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in
2615 mm / 103.0 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
235 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.310
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.8 cu-in / 1996.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.1 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
188 Nm / 138.7 lb-ft @ 4150 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
43%
23%
Pros
- Improved engine lineup
- Decent reliability
- Available as both hard- and soft-top
- Decent petrol engines
- OK-looking with the top down
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Quite ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Diesel in convertible
- No independent rear suspensions
- Quite slow
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat awkward styling
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly with the top up
- No powerful engine options
- Poor chassis and suspension
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.