Compare Nissan 200SX S15 vs Nissan Altima 4 Coupe vs Chrysler Sebring Coupe 2
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.5
3.5
2.4
2.4 AT
3.0
3.0 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
454 L / 16.0 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.6 L / 8.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.8 L / 4.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
215/55 R17
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1285 mm / 50.6 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
1365 mm / 53.7 in
Size | Length
4445 mm / 175.0 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4830 mm / 190.2 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1796 mm / 70.7 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2635 mm / 103.7 in
Performance
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.0:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2002
2007 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
72%
37%
38%
Pros
- Good overall styling
- Small turning circle
- Reliable drivetrain
- Reliable engines
- Decent exterior and interior finish
- Elegant styling
- Reasonably reliable drivetrain
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Less handsome than the S14
- CVT
- Impractical
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.