Compare Alpina D4 F32
Alpina D4 F32 | |
---|---|
Reviews | |
Neofiliac score | 73% |
Pros |
|
Cons |
|
Price | |
Offers (incl. referral links) | |
Remove |
[[{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Cargo Capacity","Fv":"445 L / 15.7 cu-ft"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Fuel Capacity","Fv":"57.0 L / 15.1 gal"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Passengers","Fv":"4"},{"Ft":"Capacity","Fn":"Payload","Fv":"520 kg / 1146 lbs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Front","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Brakes | Rear","Fv":"Ventilated discs"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Power Steering","Fv":"Electric Steering"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Front","Fv":"MacPherson strut"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Suspension | Rear","Fv":"Multi-link"},{"Ft":"Chassis","Fn":"Tire Size","Fv":"245/35 ZR19, 265/35 ZR19"},{"Ft":"Construction","Fn":"Body Style","Fv":"2-door Coupe"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Height","Fv":"1382 mm / 54.4 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Length","Fv":"4640 mm / 182.7 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Size | Width","Fv":"1825 mm / 71.9 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Front","Fv":"1552.0 mm / 61.1 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Track Width | Rear","Fv":"1576.0 mm / 62.0 in"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Weight","Fv":"1585.0 kg / 3494.3 lbs"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheel Size","Fv":"8J x 19, 9J x 19"},{"Ft":"Dimensions","Fn":"Wheelbase","Fv":"2810 mm / 110.6 in"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h","Fv":"4.6 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph","Fv":"4.4 sec"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"CO2 Emission","Fv":"139 g/km"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Fuel Economy","Fv":"5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (combined) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (urban) | 4.9 L/100km / 48.0 MPG (highway)"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Top Speed","Fv":"278.0 km/h / 172.7 mph"},{"Ft":"Performance","Fn":"Towing Capacity","Fv":"750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Drivetrain Layout","Fv":"Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Emission Standard","Fv":"Euro 6"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Bore","Fv":"84.0 mm / 3.3 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Compression Ratio","Fv":"16.5:1"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Displacement","Fv":"3.0 L / 182.6 cu-in / 2993.0 cc"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Power","Fv":"350.0 hp / 261.0 kW @ 4000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Specific Output","Fv":"116.9 hp/L / 1.9 hp/cu-in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Stroke","Fv":"90.0 mm / 3.5 in"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Torque","Fv":"700 Nm / 516.3 lb-ft @ 1500-3000 rpm"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Engine | Type","Fv":"Bi-turbocharged commonrail diesel inline-6 engine"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Gears","Fv":"8-speed"},{"Ft":"Powertrain","Fn":"Transmission | Type","Fv":"Automatic Switch-Tronic"},{"Ft":"Production","Fn":"Availability","Fv":"2014 ~ 2020"}]]
Related Products
BMW 4 Series F32 LCI 2017
- Improve petrol engine reliability
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
· 76%
BMW 3 Series E92 2006
- Elegant styling (much better than the E90 sedan)
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
· 67%
BMW 2 Series F22 2014
- Better styled than the 1 Series Coupe E82
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
· 77%
BMW 2 Series G42 2021
- True BMW characteristics
- Decent performance in the I6 model
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
· 78%
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.