Compare Toyota Land Cruiser J200 vs Toyota 4Runner 4 (N210) vs Toyota Sequoia (XK30/XK40)

Toyota Land Cruiser J200

Toyota 4Runner 4 (N210)

Toyota Sequoia (XK30/XK40)

Toyota Land Cruiser J200Toyota 4Runner 4 (N210)Toyota Sequoia (XK30/XK40)
Variants
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
4.0 236
4.0 236 4WD
4.0 245
4.0 245 4WD 4AT
4.0 245 4WD 5AT
4.7 235
4.7 235 4WD
4.7 260
4.7 260 4WD
4.7 270
4.7 270 4WD
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
4.7 VVT-i AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score98%76%76%
Pros
  • Highest reliability record
  • The best offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Superb fit and finish
  • Superb build quality
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High fuel consumption
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Worse offroad capabilities than the Land Cruiser
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.