Compare Toyota Sequoia (XK30/XK40) vs Toyota Land Cruiser J200 vs Nissan Armada (TA60)

Toyota Sequoia (XK30/XK40)

Toyota Land Cruiser J200

Nissan Armada (TA60)

Toyota Sequoia (XK30/XK40)Toyota Land Cruiser J200Nissan Armada (TA60)
Variants
4.7 AWD
4.7 RWD
4.7 VVT-i AWD
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
5.6 317 4WD
5.6 317
5.6 305
5.6 309 4WD

Reviews

Neofiliac score76%98%60%
Pros
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Very high cargo capacity
  • Highest reliability record
  • The best offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Superb fit and finish
  • High cargo capacity
  • Very imposing exterior
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Worse offroad capabilities than the Land Cruiser
  • Bland styling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High fuel consumption
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.