Compare Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift vs Mazda MX-30 (DR) vs Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift

Mazda MX-30 (DR)

Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 faceliftMazda MX-30 (DR)Mercedes-Benz EQA H243
Variants
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%4%26%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Pay less tax
  • Up to 426km electric range
Cons
  • Falsely sold as SUV
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Horrible hunchback crossover styling
  • Crossover nonsense
  • BEV nonsense
  • Rudimentary suspension setup
  • Bland and ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.