Compare Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift vs DS 3 Crossback vs Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 facelift

DS 3 Crossback

Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class X156 faceliftDS 3 CrossbackMercedes-Benz EQA H243
Variants
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.5 BlueHDi 110
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-Tense
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+

Reviews

Neofiliac score36%8%26%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 426km electric range
Cons
  • Falsely sold as SUV
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor handling
  • Bland and ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.