Compare Nissan X-Trail 3 vs Nissan Murano vs Nissan Rogue 2

Variants
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi AWD
1.6 dCi CVT
1.6 DIG-T
2.0 dCi AWD
2.0 dCi AWD CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
AWD
FWD
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
923 L / 32.6 cu-ft ~ 2005 L / 70.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
82.0 L / 21.7 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.0 deg
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 225/55 R19
235/65 R18
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1715 mm / 67.5 in
1690 mm / 66.5 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4765 mm / 187.6 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 19
18 in
Wheelbase
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
248.0 hp / 184.9 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
70.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
333 Nm / 245.6 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2002 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
26%
37%
Pros
  • Improved styling
  • Marginal offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Improved styling
  • Improved interior appointments
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • Unreliable drivetrain
  • Strange design
  • No powerful engine options
  • CVT
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad engine reputation
  • Unreliable CVTs
  • Poor handling
  • MacPherson front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.