Compare Nissan Murano 2 vs Nissan Murano vs Nissan Rogue 2
Variants
2.5 dCi AT
2.5 dCi AWD AT
3.5 256 AT
3.5 256 AWD CVT
AWD
FWD
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
923 L / 32.6 cu-ft ~ 2005 L / 70.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
82.0 L / 21.7 gal
82.0 L / 21.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.0 deg
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
27.0 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link, Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1690 mm / 66.5 in
Size | Length
4860 mm / 191.3 in
4765 mm / 187.6 in
Size | Width
1885 mm / 74.2 in
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2825 mm / 111.2 in
2825 mm / 111.2 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1585 kg / 3494 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
VQ35DE
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
248.0 hp / 184.9 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
70.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
333 Nm / 245.6 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
26%
37%
Pros
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Decent engine reliability
- High cargo capacity
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
Cons
- Horrible styling
- Lethargic to drive
- Strange design
- No powerful engine options
- CVT
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.